Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@verizon.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] MO2R ? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:52:09 -0600 (CST)
MO2R? You mean Multi/2? I do believe that there are already a few contests that have the category. 73, ron w3wn Tom, this is a really GREAT synopsis of SO2R now how about MO2R? The same thing as SO2R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00340.html (7,677 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting, arranged QSO's and the CQ 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:18:52 -0500
Is it "legal"? Is it either explicitly permitted or prohibited within the rules of the contest? If not either way, it might fall into a "gray area" depending on how one interprets the rules. [Althoug
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00451.html (11,381 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:03:21 -0500
Not neccesarily. Obviously the spotter wished to remain anonymous, but this could mean it was someone who was hiding to protect their own "non-assisted" entry. It's sad the lengths that some people a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00482.html (8,124 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest]Self-spotting, arranged QSO's and the CQ 160 contest (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:21:24 -0600 (CST)
I don't see a problem with requests like this. It's one thing to say "Look for me" or "Hope you work me" etc. But it's quite another thing to say "I'll meet you on 14.175 as 2200 Z on Saturday, 21.27
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00489.html (8,579 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:29:34 -0600 (CST)
True. But that doesn't tell you who the anonymous spotter is or was. And frankly, if I were of the mindset to use a phony call to self-spot or otherwise post misleading spots (not that I recommend th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00490.html (9,973 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Prefixes in WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:02:09 -0500
Simple. The treaty between the US and Canada that permits "instant reciprocity" mandates that the location modifier must follow the call sign. At the time the treaty was signed, the "slant location"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00090.html (9,723 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:18:09 -0500
Since you asked... yes. --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of K4RO Kirk Pickering Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:34
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00138.html (7,746 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] what PX can I use? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:02:24 -0500
Now... why would one even consider asking the ARRL to comment on the rules, specifically the use of prefixes, in a CQ Magazine sponsored contest? I would hope that if someone does ask someone up at L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00169.html (17,347 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:20:00 -0500
Or, if you use a field checker like Arnie, just tell him as he looks over the cards what to count and not count. That's what I did when K3AIR looked my cards over on Christmas Eve! 73 Sorry Paul...bu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00232.html (12,951 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL cards (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:55:29 -0500
Shelby, as a manager, I can see why you're only interested in one side of the card. But not all of our cards (direct or buro) go to managers. And there are those of us who appreciate a nice looking Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00234.html (10,557 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:38:11 -0500
You have expressed this directly to the sender, haven't you? [And what is "the full wrath," anyway? DQ?] Frankly, under these circumstances, one would think that an email like this sent to a less tha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00303.html (9,577 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] T93J in ARRL test (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:24:49 -0500
Heard him but never got through to him. Maybe his new license hasn't been issued yet? Or he likes "T9" better than "E7?" I know they were having a transition period, but I don't know if it ended yet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00367.html (8,870 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to CAC (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:04:50 -0500
It ain't broke. Don't fix it. 73, ron w3wn --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Randy Thompson Sent: Wednesday, February
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00400.html (12,091 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to CAC (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:17:06 -0500
No. Improving and fixing are two different things. IMHO. Both are tinkering. One to make it better. One to fix a mistake or error or major problem. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" means don't fix i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00439.html (10,255 bytes)

135. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:30:38 -0500
I'm sorry... what "current mess"? Never mind that the software may not always be right... especially but not limited to the US and the number of stations who's calls don't match their perceived WAZ o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00440.html (11,130 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] W0RAA's Brilliant Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:33:13 -0500
The Pa QSO Party did that about 25 or so years ago. What took you so long? Rich and co.- Agreed! We axed the sig report in the North Carolina QSO party several years ago-- W4NC: CQ NCQP W4NC W1AW: W1
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00441.html (10,530 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:22:36 -0500
Why exchange it at all? To make sure you got it right the first time, for one thing. Computer logging (which goes back more than 20 years, BTW) is not the issue at hand. If you want to discuss prefil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00457.html (10,813 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests? (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:40:44 -0600 (CST)
But... the problem per se with the exchange (if any) is not the cut number, but the misuse/abuse of them. So we dump the exchange to a more generic, easier, less meaningful one... to avoid problems w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00488.html (10,895 bytes)

139. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:11:23 -0500
So the solution to the misuse of cut numbers by a tiny handful of contesters... is to simplify the exchange so as to not inconvenience, let alone challenge, a participant? will, it's not what's broke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00572.html (10,283 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:22:19 -0500
The contest exchange in question, that is, for the DX side of the ARRL DX contest, requires a small amount of skill to decipher. Especially on CW, when cut numbers and abbrevriations are the norm, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00585.html (17,088 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu