Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wn3vaw@verizon.net: 729 ]

Total 729 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Extinction (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:19:24 -0400
OK. In response to a few recent posts: So: the general amateur population in the US is greying. So: you don't see as many younger hams active as contesters. So: you think there are too many inactive
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00072.html (12,082 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:00:29 -0400
Who comes up with this stuff anyway? Now we have a "standard" list for all 3076+ US counties? Just like that? I'm sorry, but it is just not possible to subscribe to every mail list in existance, and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00120.html (9,830 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2x4 County designators (was Contest Rules) (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:04:19 -0500 (CDT)
Bud, with all due respect, I fail to see this as something ?imperative,? at least for the vast majority of single state QSO parties. Let?s back up a second and think about why we?re using these abbre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00141.html (12,117 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest] NA RTTY Sprint This Sunday (SaturdayEvening in (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:42:35 -0500 (CDT)
One word of caution for the NA RTTY Sprint: This weekend is also the Pennsylvania QSO Party, and this year's contest is including both RTTY and PSK-31 modes. So it is very likely that there will be P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00155.html (9,168 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4 letter Abbreviations (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:00:07 -0500 (CDT)
Larry, Thanks for the explanation. It certainly helps to hear things directly from the source! One question remains in my mind, though; I don't know whether or not you'd know the answer. If you desig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00168.html (10,170 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] N3SH Bonus Stations in the Pa QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:22:07 -0500 (CDT)
I'm a touch surprised that this question has come up now, as it has been discussed multiple times on the Pa QSO reflector, and I believe I've mentioned it here from time to time to. The N3SH Bonus St
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00197.html (8,955 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 46, Issue 25 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 00:51:59 -0400
Well Rex, there are two sides to every story... sometimes three. About 6-7 years ago, give or take, I made inquiries to the Powers That Be about how we could assist the Pa QSO Party in adapting a Cab
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00250.html (12,864 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:56:55 -0400
For once, I find myself in agreement with Mal. There is absolutely no reason that there should be SSB operations below 7025 (I'd even say 7030). We have contesters have a responsibility to leave spec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00582.html (10,012 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:07:14 -0500
I must admit to being disappointed to some of the responses to Mal's comments. Not surprised, but disappointed. Yes, the issue of SSB encroaching on the 40 meter CW band has been discussed before, so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00596.html (11,096 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 07:29:58 -0500
No. I'm not talking about a so-called level playing field, that is a different issue. I'm talking about taking responsibility for one's own operating. That and respect for other band users. I would h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00615.html (14,931 bytes)

71. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:24:50 -0500
We're not telling the SSB op he can't operate on 40 (or any other band), we're saying that the SSB op has to respect other users. Most administrations around the world have not adapted band/mode limi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00631.html (12,460 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:14:10 -0500
1. Self-restraint is complete bushwah? In other words, anything goes? 2. My analogy is flawed? Hmmm. 40 is taken over by contesters, so if you don't want to contest, go to another band. That's not "a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00661.html (11,602 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:20:25 -0500
Ah, but we're not talking about "30th Street" etc. To play on the analogy, what I'm saying is that it's one thing if 30th - 100th Street in 40-ville is blocked, it's another thing if 40-ville itself
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00664.html (9,791 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:07:20 -0500
Joe, your reply truly saddens me. But I will give you this much credit; unlike many of the others who seem to feel as you do, at least you will stand up (metaphorically speaking) and say so publicly.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00701.html (13,189 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:01:27 -0500
Why should the 18 wheelers get to use the sidewalk when the street is crowded? Why should the pedestrian on the sidewalk be told to get out of the way and go to the park because the 18 wheelers feel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00719.html (8,868 bytes)

76. Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:28:39 -0500
Hmmm. One last comment: I'm not saying "go away." (Although, isn't that what some of the others in this discussion HAVE said to people who object to contesters dominating a given band to the exclusio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00724.html (19,893 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 47, Issue 13 (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 11:21:57 -0500
FWIW... Back in my college days, during SS Phone, the check being sent by K3CR was incorrect (they started with the year the operator was first licensed, 75 I think, not the year the club station was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00140.html (9,569 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized forgetting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:03:55 -0500
I've also heard from the ARRL Contest Branch that the check per se isn't significant as long as it's consistent. In other words, they're not going to, er, check your check. The purpose of the check a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00323.html (9,878 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] section names, SD v SDG (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:15:50 -0500
I wouldn't assume that. We saw a couple of stations in San Diego sending SD instead of SDG in the Pa QSO Party last month, so when in doubt, we asked and confirmed if it was one or the other. Some fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00324.html (10,455 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes: Should I be penalized for getting mylicense in 2000? (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 23:29:31 -0500
Jeff, FWIW, you are absolutely correct. That's what the rules say, that's what's supposed to be done. The reality is that some people don't follow that rule. Some like K0HB (not to pick on him, but h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00326.html (13,588 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu