Mail Archive Search: <+from:z.pitman@libertel.nl>

Results:

References: [ +from:z.pitman@libertel.nl: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 1997 results...some analyse (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Mon Nov 2 13:34:02 1998; Hi Timo et al, Isn't there a DQ-limit for this ? I remember in some contest if the claimed score is 5% (or so) less then the claimed it resulted autoamtic DQ. 73s Zoli HA1AG <snip> <snip> -- CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-11/msg00009.html (8,472 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Contest-free 10M ARRL (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Mon Dec 14 11:15:25 1998; Easy... The LU novices should use split like we in EU do it on 80m phone. 73s Zoli HA1AG -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@cont; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00093.html (8,627 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Contest station in PA/ON/DL for WPX CW ? (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Tue Mar 25 16:12:15 1997; Hi folks, I'm seeking for a contest station in a need of a CW contest op. I'm an avid CW op with 10+ years of M/S and M/M experience with different HG contest stations. Now I live in Maastricht, Neth; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-03/msg00353.html (7,021 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX CONTEST SURVEY RESULTS 1 (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Thu Apr 3 09:14:49 1997; Item Subject: Message text Tom, What I really missed from your survey is the geographical distribution of the votes. It would be as informative as the number of votes, I believe. 73s Zoli HA1AG -- CQ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00180.html (8,577 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] IARU rules (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Wed Jul 2 10:04:13 1997; No, hopefully you're right. "Stations" should mean a radio sites regardless of the number of operators. IMO, it should be 15 min's with 5 min's tolerance of the time-stamps on both sides...(maybe ARR; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00023.html (6,901 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997; Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00228.html (7,464 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997; Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00468.html (7,461 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] keying... (score: 1): Author: z.pitman@libertel.nl (z.pitman@libertel.nl); Date: Mon Jul 21 18:06:09 1997; Just a pratical observation: in my opinion it's better to send the dots (short ones) with the forefinger. That finger is somehow more agile. IMO, it doesn't effect the "side-changing" ability. When I; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00701.html (7,467 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]