- 1. [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:58:12 -0600
- Since I lost credit for a maritime mobile contact (and mult) in last year's 10 Meter Contest, I was wondering what the proper way to log these in a Cabrillo file is. Using my own call as an example,
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00259.html (9,445 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 08:43:49 -0800 (PST)
- It would be nice if ARRL clarified the rules in this area, all it says is: 5.2.4. ITU regions (maritime mobiles only). CT accepts R1, R2 and R3. But I don't know if that's what the log checker expect
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00262.html (8,951 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 11:23:59 -0600
- Seems like WM5R/M2 worked, but I can't remember for sure. Chuck W5PR Cabrillo -- kharker@cs.utexas.edu WM5R Club Laptops http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/ -- -- The world's top contesters battl
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00263.html (10,687 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Totten, N4GN" <n4gn@n4gn.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:08:09 -0500 (EST)
- I was wondering exactly this last night as I was testing my logging software. It turns out we didn't have any /MM QSOs last year, so I don't have any definitive answer to your question. Is there any
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00266.html (8,635 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:54:24 -0500
- I'm part of the team that does the logchecking for the ARRL 10M contest, so let me clarify the situation with Ken's log, and also answer N4GN's question. First, for the ARRL 10M contest we expect the
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00270.html (12,907 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:08:45 -0600
- Of course, I didn't work any /MM stations this year :-) I have absolutely no idea how I would have ever guessed that MM1 or MM2 would be an acceptable way to log that exchange. Maybe if I were operat
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00290.html (10,320 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Totten, N4GN" <n4gn@n4gn.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:39:50 -0500 (EST)
- Thanks for the clear explanation, Dave. That's good info to understand! And thanks to N2NL/MM, the issue is more than simply academic for my log this year. While we seem to be in a mode of handing ou
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00297.html (9,058 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] /MM in ARRL 10 (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 08:59:11 -0800
- That could be taken as WM5R portable in the 2nd district of Great Britain (G2) -- __________________________________________________________________________ Alan Zack Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ Las
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00332.html (12,275 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu