Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[DX\-IS\]\s+RBN\s+Announcement\s+on\s+FT8\s+Spotting\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Radio KØHB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:32:11 +0000
Since virtually all FT8 operations are clustered into their own 3kHz smoking-pit on each band, the mode requires no searching around the band for individual signals. Essentially the entire workable b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00077.html (12,875 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim Preston <jpreston1@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:01:42 -0700
I agree with Hans. I don't see any need to have FT8 signals spotted on RBN. Yes, I do use FT8 quite a bit. 73, Jim N6VH That, coupled with the very detailed graphic presentations at sites like pskrep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00080.html (13,962 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 18:55:13 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting To: "DX-IS@yahoogroups.com" <DX-IS@yahoogroups.com>, "RBN-OPS@groups.io" <RBN-OPS@groups.io>, "sysops@dxcluster.info" <sysops@dxclus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00088.html (8,037 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:50:29 -0400
I agree fully with Hans. Theres no need for it on FT8 unless youre dealing with aggregate data for propagation mapping and station performance metering. 73 Ria N2RJ __________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00089.html (14,753 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Hank Greeb <n8xx@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:25:26 -0400
Again, we could and should resolve this issue by banning every mode for contesting except sp*rk Gap transmission and coherrer detectors. NEVER include anything which is newer than 1910. But, from wha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00092.html (7,484 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:06:03 +0300
See no reason whatsoever for FT8 spots on RBN..... and, yes, I do work FT8 occassionally. What would be an improvement for RBN is to actually make it possible to select a few skimmers, instead of sel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00095.html (16,415 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-IS] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Paolo, IK3QAR" <ik3qar@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 16:25:19 +0200
What would be an improvement for RBN is to actually make it possible to select a few skimmers, instead of selecting a continent's ALL skimmers, as the amount of spots now create huge data flows. This
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00099.html (10,028 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu