Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[N1MM\]\s+CW\s+Timing\s+Issues\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[N1MM\]\s+CW\s+Timing\s+Issues\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] CW Timing Issues? (score: 1): Author: Rich Seifert <ke1b@richseifert.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:05:24 -0700; [snip] Andrew: I am also a die-hard CW contester, and a Macolyte. Your conclusion is generally correct. When I first used software-generated CW from my general purpose/logging computer, I would notic; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00037.html (10,158 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] CW Timing Issues? (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Blaine" <keepwalking188@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:47:14 -0500; There is no reason fundamentally that the modern walmart special desktop PC cannot run N1MM and several other apps with complete capability to key CW properly. The timing issues are zero point zero u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00038.html (13,248 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] CW Timing Issues? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:09:41 -0400; It seems that good programmers like Don Agro (MacLogger DX) and Thomas Linder (RUMLog/RUMped) don't have any trouble with good quality CPU generated CW ("bit pounding") although they cam also use Win; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00039.html (11,541 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]