Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[NCCC\]\s+Cheaters\,\s+Logs\s+\&\s+Self\-Policing\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Cheaters, Logs & Self-Policing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown K9YC" <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:52:32 -0700
Not only that, I was DISGUSTED by the posts that came into my box in the thread about somebody's score not being mentioned in QST, and how many thousands of dollars he had SPENT to achieve a big scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00026.html (8,499 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Cheaters, Logs & Self-Policing (score: 1)
Author: "Donald Kerns" <dkerns@cruzio.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 08:27:14 -0700
"If you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to worry about." That said, having open logs seems like a no brainer to me. 73 de Donald -- ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00027.html (8,092 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Cheaters, Logs & Self-Policing (score: 1)
Author: Dave N6NZ <n6nz@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 08:42:22 -0700
Here's a clue for you guys... I *know* about the existence of cq-contest, I was a subscriber for years. It revived my interest in contesting, in fact. It brought me into the NCCC. Yet, I am not curre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00029.html (9,834 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Cheaters, Logs & Self-Policing (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:47:02 -0400
If I'm not doing anything wrong, why are you being nosy? I have never liked that argument. It always seems that someone says that when they're digging for something else, something that may not exist
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00057.html (10,445 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu