Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[YCCC\]\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+in\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:24:37 -0500
Great point Randy! The untenable fact now is that those using clean transmitters (esp K3) are clearly at a disadvantage when running because they're just sitting ducks, i.e. inviting someone to get r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00093.html (12,138 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: George K5KG via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:46:25 -0500
Ok, I will name names. TO7A in FM gets the KEY CLIX AWARD FOR 2016! He was not only massively loud [a good thing], but his clicks were absolutely terrible. At one point, I told him "om bad clix", but
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00104.html (13,642 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Björn SM0MDG <bjorn@sm0mdg.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 23:08:50 +0100
With SDR and panadapters becoming more and more used in contests, why not a wall of shame where screen shots of CW clicks and SSB splatter can be posted? 73 de Björn, SM0MDG SE0X ____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00108.html (8,479 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:49:13 +0000
I support this suggestion. I am definitely warming up my panadapter. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00112.html (9,516 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <jbastin@sssnet.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:59:19 -0500
My notes on the contest contain two items along this line: Buzz on IK7RVY His signal reminded me of my early days back in the 60s when we beginners had code practice kits that were nothing more than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00113.html (9,005 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:33:26 +0200
Barry, K3 can be set to click. Just set the rise and/or fall times too short i.e. sharp and listen k# click. K3 owners have a big responsibility in setting the radio correctly so it serves the owner
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00124.html (15,145 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:06:10 +0200
George, others .. Please consider the panadapter may show strong signals as wide. Most web sdr receivers show strong signals wide. Please verify the wide signals that they actually are wide. In case
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00129.html (16,071 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: "Stephen Bloom" <sbloom@acsalaska.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:07:38 -0900
Hey all: I do think if someone has a dirty signal ...whether clicks on cw, or "splatter" on SSB ..first thing is to let the op know. If they don't show any interest ...then ..yeah ..put it out there.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00132.html (17,561 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:15:20 +0700
Citing magazine articles I can not get is not helpful One of you complainers, who knows something, post THE WAY TO ADJUST TO AVOID CLICKS. Simple directions. Thanks, Charly -- Charly, HS0ZCW ________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00136.html (19,914 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:04:32 -0800
On Mon,2/22/2016 6:33 PM, Jukka Klemola wrote: K3 can be set to click. Just set the rise and/or fall times too short i.e. sharp and listen k# click. That can be done with most JA rigs, but the K3 key
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00139.html (9,435 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 01:26:11 -0800
Not GOOD ones, and not if you know how to read the display. The P3 is quite accurate, and compares quite well with my $1,000 ANAN 10E (as long as the 10E is not overloaded). Most web sdr receivers sh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00140.html (12,320 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:26:40 +0000
Please consider the panadapter may show strong signals as wide. Most web sdr receivers show strong signals wide. That is normal. Any station 60db above the noise appears, and is, wider at the noise
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00141.html (10,773 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:30:06 +0000
Maybe I'm missing something but there is no rise time setting in the K3. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00144.html (16,843 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:06:43 +0200
OK I have read this kind of texts: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/CW-Rise-Time-td3218979.html I do not have a K3. In case K3 does not have a setting for CW edges, I am surprised. This means the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00155.html (18,732 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:35:07 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Most contesters turn on their shiny (many $$$) transceivers put it in CW mode and go to it. I feel the manufacturers should make sure the rig does not click and should have instructions in the manual
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00164.html (17,148 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Mike Loukides <mikel@oreilly.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:56:40 -0500
Well, I've heard a few stations going REALLY fast. 50+. Particularly the ones that speed up for 5NN. But I suspect the problem isn't actually key clicks as such. Just like the phone contests are full
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00166.html (19,761 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:04:24 -0800
On Tue,2/23/2016 1:26 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote: That is normal. Any station 60db above the noise appears, and is, wider at the noise floor than one that is 6db above the noise. If the stations have simi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00179.html (13,764 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Tony Brock-Fisher via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:49:22 -0500
Which raises the point, why do manufacturers allow a setting that will knowingly cause interference? If they provide the setting, and know what it does because they have implemented it, can't they te
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00180.html (17,742 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 13:35:07 -0500
Can we please just stop all this nonsense about making a K3 click? Maybe there was one errant firmware release 6 years ago that was quickly fixed. But the K3 has been about THE cleanest cw transmitte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00186.html (9,328 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:38:07 -0800
Is there a possibiity in K3 to upgrade the firmware? I presume it is much more difficult than a setting in a menu somewhere. There is NO setting for keying rise time, and there never has been. The de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00191.html (11,758 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu