Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[YCCC\]\s+Key\s+Clicks\s+in\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+CW\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:53:55 -0800
Gee, lies continue to be repeated as fact, just as with politics! The K3, K3S, and KX3 CANNOT be made to click. Most other modern radios click by default, and can be made to click even more by menu s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00192.html (9,474 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:02:26 -0800
Because they are dumber than they look. The generally poor performance of Yaesu and Icom rigs in this regard are evidence of this fact. And because users think fast rise times are needed for well def
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00193.html (11,002 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:05:49 -0800
The results are additive -- rise time causes clicks, overdrive causes clicks. and forgetting to plug in the ALC cable on the amp. WRONG! Using ALC between the rig and the amp is a CAUSE of clicks and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00194.html (10,681 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: John E Bastin <jbastin@sssnet.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:23:54 -0500
Your logging program probably wouldnt include the fourth character in the Cabrillo file, and the contest log checkers ignore the signal report when checking log accuracy, anyway. 73, John K8AJS jbast
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00196.html (9,819 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:15:34 -0700
There seems to be some universal law of human nature that the more idiotic or extravagant the claim the more life it has, and the more likely it gets repeated as Mr. Thompson has done here. Dave AB7E
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00218.html (9,876 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:27:33 +0200
Sirs David and Jim, all folks on cq-contest -channel, Too much splattering. I was the one to come up with a thought K3 rise/fall times can be adjusted. Please concentrate your responding signals to m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00221.html (12,269 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:35:58 -0800
Rather than "think," it would probably be far better if you were to STUDY the documentation for modern radios and the impartial testing done by ARRL Labs, and published on their website. I have done
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00247.html (11,621 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:22:33 -0700
Jukka has based all his comments on something he recently read on Nabble ... apparently without noticing that the reference was originally posted way back in 2009 (seven years ago). In addition, it a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00257.html (12,744 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 06:59:19 +0200
I have referred to this Jim's document in my earlier write ups for the Finnish audience. Jim's study on the transmitter cleanliness is groundbreaking and really the first of it's kind. Jim is showing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00261.html (14,597 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 07:11:22 +0200
Well .. maybe so. I am still puzzled why change something drastically without an apparent reason to fix anything. My assumption was the end user has a capability to fix the production alignment (?) o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00262.html (14,217 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Barry N1EU <n1eu.barry@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:56:25 +0000
The K3 rise time isn't 2.5msec. Here's what N6KR said on the subject to the Field tester group in May 2010. This comment was partly in response to whether rise time would be shortened for the new K3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00267.html (13,805 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] [YCCC] Key Clicks in ARRL DX CW (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:28:32 -0800
The modifications described by this conversation were to improve the clarity of keying, not to eliminate clicks. I understand this so there is some possibility a small K3 population is operational a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00274.html (11,523 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu