Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[sysops\]\s+RBN\s+Announcement\s+on\s+FT8\s+Spotting\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+\[sysops\]\s+RBN\s+Announcement\s+on\s+FT8\s+Spotting\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] [sysops] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1): Author: Michael Adams <mda@n1en.org>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:47:05 +0000; A couple of thoughts on FT8 in the RBN: I view the RBN as a multi-purpose tool. For me, it's critical in contesting (I like assisted S&P; it might not be as magical as spinning the dial, but rate is; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00078.html (9,288 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [sysops] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1): Author: N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 14:56:54 -0400; The RBN applies the same standard to FT8 as to CW and RTTY - only CQ (equivalent) spots and only re-spotting once every 10 minutes on a given dial frequency. However, as our first tests indicate, th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00085.html (12,318 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] [sysops] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting (score: 1): Author: Timothy Coker via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:10:18 +0000 (UTC); I think you bring up some valid points. My fear is that during contest periods the RBN is overloaded. Im not a RTTY guy, but I did spend the software license fee to monitor and post RTTY spots to the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-06/msg00086.html (12,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]