Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1977\s+vanity\s+calls\s+\(was\s+Watch\s+your\s+dits\s+this\s+weekend\)\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:31:56 -0600
I clearly remember the "gates". I was in the second group. My first two choices (W9CW and W9DS) went in the first gate; I got choice #3. (and am VERY happy I didn't get #2!) A few years ago at Dayton
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00540.html (9,923 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:58:18 -0500
PULLEEZE! Those 1977 call signs were NOT *vanity* call signs. They were issued on request to those who had passed the Extra Class exam when the exam still meant something. As far as I am concerned, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00542.html (7,657 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:38:38 -0600
Yes, you're right. And those of us who got them didn't have to pay anything extra and do not have to pay any vanity call fees. I don't recall the words "vanity call" being used by anyone back then. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00545.html (8,477 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: "hank.k8dd" <hank.k8dd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:07:31 -0500
In the second round of the "2 letter call" program they were free and you could put in for up to 26 choices. No VanityHQ web sites. No web sites, so all we had to go by was the call book and QST Sile
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00548.html (10,716 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: Mike/Shelley Ritz <micritz@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
I'd like to make a point that a lot of calls today do not qualify as vanity calls either, despite what the FCC calls them. If your name is Abel B. Charlie, and you request the call of K1ABC, that to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00549.html (9,695 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Schmidt <w9cf@ptolemy.la.asu.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:46:29 -0700
1. Beginning July 1, 1976 a person holding an extra class and a 1x2 may request a specific 1x2. A person holding an an extra who was first licensed at least 25 years ago may request a 1x2 call. 2. Be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00550.html (9,138 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:23:45 -0800 (PST)
You are right Hank.  I put in for 12 different calls the end of 1977...the deadline for the last time you could get a 1 X 2 call because you were a true-blue-gosh-darn-American-Extra was December 31,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00552.html (8,792 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:26:37 +0000
ex-WA1STN replied to ex-KW6C's suggestion that 1x2s issued prior to the substantial overhaul of USA call sign system in 1978 were "vanity" calls: The criteria to ask for something other-than-what-you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00557.html (9,117 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1977 vanity calls (was Watch your dits this weekend) (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 19:26:35 -0800
Whether you got the "preferred" call in 1977 or 30 years alter, the reason was the same. Maybe to have a short call for contesting, possibly to shed a laborious to pronounce call (I was WB0WFF), perh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00558.html (10,403 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu