Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+1980s\s+checks\s+in\s+SS\/SSB\.\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob, W3IDT" <w3idt@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:02:28 -0500
There MAY be another phenomenon re 1980's checks... (Daughter) K3MIM was initially licensed in 1989 (as KA3UBJ). When starting 'serious' SS/SSB (from the W3LPL dx-contest station) she found "89" gene
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00135.html (9,348 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek <Robert.Chudek@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:39:46 -0600
/"Just maybe others licensed in 80 - 89 have changed their checks?"/ Actually, it's a know fact that _some_ operators change their check to try and thwart the "appliance contesters" out there. :-) 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00137.html (10,198 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 17:53:09 -0500
Bob: The rule does say "The last 2 digits of the year of first license", but I doubt anyone will be penalized for not following this rule. Our club call was licensed in 2006, and a lot of people had
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00138.html (10,184 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:10:37 -0500
Actually, it's a know fact that _some_ operators change their check to try and thwart the "appliance contesters" out there. :-) This is a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00139.html (7,022 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:40:26 -0600 (CST)
Maybe, Rich. Maybe. This wasn't a problem for me this year. Whatever the operator sent is what I logged, regardless of what a database or online listing might have shown. Heck, I even worked A Boy &
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00140.html (8,843 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:13:26 -0600
Hi Rich, Hope you're well. To me, this is a pretty good case for turning off any autofill feature (aside from fills of exchanges from the same contest (for contests where you can work guys multiple t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00142.html (9,257 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:46:27 -0500
Go back maybe 2-3 (?) years ago and there was a long discussion about the check, its meaning, what should you use etc. I think it was in this group. No conclusions I recall. Personally I just copy wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00143.html (11,222 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:05:58 -0600
I got a good chuckle looking at the log checking reports one time. My son had used my callsign and his check (93) in SS and then, a year or so later, I operated and used my check (67). I noticed that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00145.html (8,157 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek <Robert.Chudek@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:37:28 -0600
My personal preference is not using any of these "crutches" for contesting. This puts me in the "active decoding" state while logging QSOs, where a mistake (bust) is fully attributable to my skill. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00146.html (9,088 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Alan Dewey via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:06:45 -0500
I've said this before. I don't user pre-fill data bases to prevent me from having to copy. I use them to reduce the amount of TYPING I have to do. I still think it is important that every exchange be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00158.html (10,677 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ferch <ve3iay@storm.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:28:42 -0500
Hi Kelly, I may not have made my point well enough. Of course you should copy what was sent, and I agree that you aren't going to be penalized by the contest adjudicators if you send a different exch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00159.html (12,854 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1980s checks in SS/SSB. (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 18:44:26 -0600
I may not have made my point well enough. My point was that when sending my own exchange, I want it to be as predictable as possible. That's not so much to ensure that the other person will get it ri
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-11/msg00165.html (9,520 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu