Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2015\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Rules\s+Preview\s+$draft\s+2$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+2015\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Rules\s+Preview\s+$draft\s+2$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] 2015 CQ WW Rules Preview (draft 2) (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:24:52 -0500; Thanks to everyone that has provided feedback and comments to the proposed CQWW rules. There is a new draft of the proposed 2015 CQ WW Rules now available at http://cqww.com/blog/preview-of-2015-cqww; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00591.html (7,736 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2015 CQ WW Rules Preview (draft 2) (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:51:58 -0700; This strikes me as successfully addressing the discussions over the past few days. No requirement of recordings, although I personally have no problem with that. QSO alerting assistance of call sign; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00609.html (7,816 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2015 CQ WW Rules Preview (draft 2) (score: 1): Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:32:56 +0200; Seems good to me. I would even have left the recording stuff inside but just have clarified that the CC would request it *before* the contest (like with a visit from an observer). Would only need cla; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00633.html (8,834 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2015 CQ WW Rules Preview (draft 2) (score: 1): Author: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 20:08:36 -0500; One thing I did not see any comments on: The original draft increased the club circle radius from 175 miles to 200 miles. The second draft increases it even more to 250 miles. What is driving this in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00646.html (9,451 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]