- 1. [CQ-Contest] 3 QSO penalty (score: 1)
- Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:31:53 -0700
- So - I suppose that makes the people who support this concept (of which there seem to a majority) are insane? I think any rational person can see that this battle has been fought over and over and th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00283.html (8,079 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 3 QSO penalty (score: 1)
- Author: "Doug Grant" <k1dg@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 00:36:37 -0000
- Especially since it was K6CTW who copied Chip's message. Of course, Tree was just making sure we were paying attention. He never busts a call... 73, Doug K1DG ________________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00291.html (7,096 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu