Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+4O3A\s+Tower\s+Height\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+4O3A\s+Tower\s+Height\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4O3A Tower Height (score: 1): Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:20:51 -0400; I concur with ZM4T. In KH6 we are limited to 90 foot towers. It really doesn't make much difference on 20-10 meters. With the huge drop to NA, EU and JA anything higher would not be very effective. H; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00181.html (7,475 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] 4O3A Tower Height (score: 1): Author: "Maciej Wieczorek" <sp2xf@wp.pl>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:12:20 +0200; Bill, I heard you many times this winter on 40m and the signal was amazing, very often much over s9, so I can assure you the 40m beam is working preety well, despite it's 90 foot tower, not 120 ;-) B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-04/msg00185.html (9,473 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]