- 1. [CQ-Contest] 80M propagation (score: 1)
- Author: n7ng@sprynet.com (n7ng@sprynet.com)
- Date: Mon Dec 1 13:41:36 1997
- For what it's worth, 80 meters as well as 40 and 160) was great on Friday night here in Wyoming. I worked all of my (50) 80M multipliers on Friday night. If the East Coast was not able to work Eu on
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00014.html (7,103 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] 80M propagation (score: 1)
- Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt Trott--K7BG)
- Date: Tue Dec 2 00:16:56 1997
- I also experienced great 80m prop on Friday night (from NorthCentral Montana). Worked 40 countries. The band was very quiet Friday but, Saturday was a different story with lotsa noise. I spent Saturd
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00027.html (7,264 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] 80M propagation (score: 1)
- Author: w4an@contesting.com (Bill Fisher - W4AN)
- Date: Tue Dec 2 10:34:23 1997
- I worked YT0T last night on 80M CW. He commented that midwest stations were louder than east coast stations during the contest. I would guess this is a general statement. I believe that the extreme N
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00030.html (7,529 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] 80M propagation (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL)
- Date: Tue Dec 2 19:40:19 1997
- One possible explanation of the poor 80M propagation from the East and Southeast is sporadic E. A large sporadic E cloud over the east coast would produce increased path loss without showing up in th
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00040.html (7,376 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] 80M propagation (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Thu Dec 4 17:40:07 1997
- 80 meters was rough. Europe was hard to work this year, but the W's were even harder to work! I knew that when I had to dig to work KC1XX that I was in trouble. Ugh! In fact, 160 was more productive
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-12/msg00093.html (7,335 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu