Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+Lack\s+of\s+Focus\?\s+\(Was\s+LotW\s+\-\s+Needs\s+MoreParticipation\)\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 07:50:42 -0700
_________________________________________________________ Why? Because the integrity of the ARRL's DXCC program is its big selling point. True, they might be able to find a more user-friendly means,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00214.html (10,777 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gilmer <n2mg2@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Banks have the benefit of long-standing relationships with their customers: access to things like Social Security numbers, established mailing addresses for the customers, even some of your money. ;-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00221.html (10,625 bytes)

3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 18:44:37 -0000
Long standing Relationship ??? Life Member since 1973 only 3 addresses in that time. Same call for most of that time, NO WAS, NO DXCC and n NO plans to try to get either. If I choose to upload my log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00247.html (8,875 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: "George Skoubis" <george.skoubis@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 00:05:36 -0500
Hi Warren, I'm a programmer at a large company and I can assure you we use a "stricter" method of transferring any files that leave our company than the LOTW method. We use 2048 bit public/private ke
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00248.html (13,757 bytes)

5. RE: [CQ-Contest] A Lack of Focus? (Was LotW - Needs MoreParticipation) (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Green WC1M" <wc1m@msn.com>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 15:57:51 -0400
A few opinions of my own (not necessarily ARRL's): First of all, LoTW is not more strict than most well-engineered online financial systems. The person who wrote that was mistaken. Second, although I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00262.html (14,216 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu