Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+Suggestion\s+for\s+2010\s+WRTC\s+Selection\s+Criteria\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+Suggestion\s+for\s+2010\s+WRTC\s+Selection\s+Criteria\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1): Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:45:31 EST; It's a little late for this now, but I think whatever organizer takes on the responsibility for the next WRTC, needs to come up with the scoring grid ahead of time instead of post-facto. Let the guys; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00542.html (8,856 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1): Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rac.ca>; Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 22:56:24 -0500; Thanks, Bill. That is exactly my point - who would bother to fly to Caribbean for ARRL DX if the same amount of points could be earned just by winning "your area" in the 4-hour NA Sprint? 73 Yuri VE3; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00545.html (10,307 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] A Suggestion for 2010 WRTC Selection Criteria (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 00:40:07 EST; ahead of time, the penalties for being a singleband effort or part of a MM crew and so forth. If guys know ahead of time what the scoring grid looks like, there should be less griping about the selec; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00548.html (8,707 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]