Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+A\s+new\s+\"DX\s+cluster\"\s+experience\s+for\s+contesters\s*$/: 100 ]

Total 100 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: John Unger <w4au@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:50:45 -0400
Yes, but another obvious point is that you never see all these types of vessels competing in the same event, which would be a handicapper's nightmare :-) ... 73 - John, W4AU _________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00191.html (10,511 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: W3DMB@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:59:57 EDT
You are right Dave, but when I am sailing, it is a rule that Power gives way to sail.. and Sail gives way to rowboats. It is not acceptable for Power to run over the canoes and rowboats.. - but those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00192.html (13,672 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:09:30 -0600
so, all the sailboats could declare it a calm day, and tie up. Let the powerboats have at it. After they all run enough gas and time, eventually they will get tired of running into each other, and th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00193.html (17,945 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:26:53 +0000
Right, so we all need to keep adding to our fun so we keep coming back for more and attract new operators! New technology adds to my fun, so I am more likely to get out on the lake to try to do somet
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00194.html (18,424 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Richard Hill <rehill@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 07:59:32 -0700
Are external wind machines considered motors? <Grin> Rich NU6T _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00195.html (21,032 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 09:16:35 -0600
Yeah, but the thing is, in the case of the slow poke sailboats, they do nothing to contribute to the possibility of winning by the power boat. Ham radio contests are one of the few (maybe the only) a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00196.html (16,923 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "W7VJ" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:38:20 -0700
Suggestions for leaving the assisted and unassisted categories make sense in the near term. Rather than a flash cut, why not leave the cluster/skimmer for the assisted, multi and "extreme" categories
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00197.html (8,981 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:44:13 +0000
The qs1r I use for my skimmer does 6m also out of the box! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00198.html (19,386 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 10:48:53 -0500
Really? You would have given up years ago? I am just curious as to why? I've been a ham since 1975, and a contester just as long. First contest was Novenmber Sweepstakes of 75, been hooked ever since
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00199.html (11,403 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:00:14 +0100
Yes, and it is the enthusiasts (the amateurs) who still go to sea in boats without engines - they depend solely on natural elements (wind, waves and currents) and their own sailing skills to get wher
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00200.html (12,966 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:33:22 -0700
I don't understand your point. The power boat versus sailboat analogy is a good one for illustrating the technology differences, but it falls apart when people start worrying about simultaneous compe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00203.html (11,770 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:07:26 -0700
Hi Andrew I think regardless of the class, it will affect everyone with the packet pileups. The packet pileups are horrible now. Just think when it gets even worse. I just wonder what it would be lik
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00204.html (9,491 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "WT2P - C. Fred Johnson" <fredwt2p@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:02:53 -0400
Technology is going to continue to move forward, people are not going to stop innovating just because some people don't like new things or change. Imagine where we would all be if the major innovator
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00205.html (9,857 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Mike N0HI <mike@n0hi.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 15:12:25 -0400
As a younger operator, I can tell you with 100% certainty and without a sliver of doubt that if we were all using paper logs and footwarmers, we would have even less attention from the younger crowd.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00206.html (13,904 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:01:36 +0000
Of course not, adding an engine moves you up to a power boat category. Adding a bigger engine moves you up to another category. When I run out of categories or improvements on the engines I get bore
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00207.html (10,065 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:04:11 +0000
I get bored easily. Call it adhd or whatever, I want to keep trying something new... now its time for some different discussion, how about how to align your owl to true south? David Robbins K1TTT e-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00208.html (11,006 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:00:46 -0400 (EDT)
Huge advantage for which contesters? So far this discussion seems to have mostly leaned toward the viewpoint of ops from "this side" of things. How about the guys on the "other side" of things, the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00209.html (11,078 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 00:24:18 +0000
I use both for what they are good for. If there were a world wide digital amateur network I would use that... probably in addition to the internet. MORE information, MORE! MORE!! I NEED MORE!!! Davi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00212.html (9,106 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <theroadtrip@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:56:32 -0500
It seems as though this conversation centres a lot around the question of progress. Is it the role of amateur radio to stand by and let the world advance around it? I would say no, and I'm sure that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00214.html (10,250 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "Edward Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:13:39 -0400
Hi Guys, This is all very interesting to me... With the influx of technology into the game in its many derivatives, I foresee the time when radio sporting will be like automobile ownership, i.e.: --T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00215.html (13,096 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu