Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+LCR\s+\-\s+they\s+remove\s+Uniques\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRL\s+DX\s+LCR\s+\-\s+they\s+remove\s+Uniques\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX LCR - they remove Uniques? (score: 1): Author: kr2q@optimum.net; Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:49:21 +0000 (GMT); Maybe I'm just a mile out of touch, but I checked my LCR for the ARRL DX (cw) and I discovered that I lost a QSO (just one) because the QSO was flagged as a Unique. I have scanned all of the ARRL rul; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00002.html (7,416 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX LCR - they remove Uniques? (score: 1): Author: saul_abrams@dps.state.ny.us; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:33:12 -0400; Doug, None of the uniques in my log were removed. Also, I disagree that 99% of uniques are busted calls. That may be true for a qrp contester, but for a high power station with big antennas in a grea; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00019.html (7,653 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]