Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRLDX\s+CW\s+\-\s+A\s+new\s+operating\s+practice\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ARRLDX\s+CW\s+\-\s+A\s+new\s+operating\s+practice\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX CW - A new operating practice (score: 1): Author: ku8e1@yahoo.com (Jeffrey Clarke); Date: Mon Feb 26 06:55:55 2001; Hi everyone,a few days before ARRL CW Contest I checked my logbook program searching for unreplied qsl cards during the years. I focused on those qsl cards sent via the bureau for contest qso's in th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00226.html (8,725 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX CW - A new operating practice (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Tue Feb 27 00:54:24 2001; Jeff, This is a twist on an old saying: A QSO is the final courtesy of a QSL! I don't blame Steve one bit. How many of the QSOs you make in a contest are active contesters? Maybe half? Why are the ot; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00234.html (10,172 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] ARRLDX CW - A new operating practice (score: 1): Author: kc1f@prodigy.net (KC1F); Date: Thu Mar 1 00:13:46 2001; Hi Steve ! Thanks for the 15 meter qso in the ARRL contest ! I guess I'm not on your list ! Your post confirmed for me that there is some price to be paid by DX contesters for ignoring incoming QSLs,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00004.html (11,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]