Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+ASSISTED\s+vs\s+UNASSISTED\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: kc5ajx@hotmail.com (Rick Bullon)
Date: Wed Mar 28 07:23:30 2001
Sorry I deleted the original message. But I believe the person wanted to know what incentive there was in being unassisted vs assisted. IMHO by starting out as unassisted you work on your operating s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00332.html (8,995 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: k8bkdx@chartermi.net (Barry Martz)
Date: Wed Mar 28 07:51:02 2001
Just a couple quick questions: 1. With all the spot sucking software and the spot web pages available, why not just eliminate the ASSISTED category? People use them and it can't be policed. 2. What a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00347.html (7,071 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: lw9euj@ciudad.com.ar (CYBERGURUES)
Date: Wed Mar 28 23:51:01 2001
As things get worse contest after contest, I hope some of the people who replied so furiously to my postings about eliminating the assisted class, get the point now. Why to create separations that we
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00355.html (8,433 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: k4sb@akorn.net (Ed)
Date: Thu Mar 29 16:54:46 2001
why not just eliminate the ASSISTED category? Well, the cheats as you point out can't be caught. But they're the ones who have to look at their score, or possible plaque, and realize they cheated in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00359.html (7,106 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: ko7ss--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 23:53:19 +0000 (UTC)
The TO7A discussion is great, maybe the first time ever that log "details" and actual callsigns are posted in a thread like this. The easy way to not worry about any of this is to just enter SOABHP(A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00194.html (7,834 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 20:23:30 -0400
funny you should mention racewalking.....our local club provides communications for a 5k walk/run every Memorial Day....there are runners, walkers, and racewalkers......now you get a free t shirt, an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00195.html (9,049 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 20:43:01 -0500
In this age of Evinrude and Mercury and Honda and.... it seems almost archaic to have sailboat races. In this age of trains and planes and automobiles..... it seems almost archaic to have 26-mile foo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00196.html (8,725 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: Bob Kupps via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 19:44:21 -0700
My sentiments exactly Hans, and my compliments to the contest committees for their preservation of these "classic" classes and policing the rules governing the various competition classes. Some class
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00201.html (9,829 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 23:28:56 -0400
Since people aren't playing by the rules maybe CQ should get tough and consider changing the single operator unassisted transmitter class to something similar to rule 3.4.4 that is used for ARRL DX :
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00202.html (8,564 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 07:28:55 -0600
And when it all comes down to it, when the final score is computed, a deep breath and you, alone, must look back and acknowledge that you did what you did, in all honesty, with a video tape of the en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00211.html (8,379 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 14:28:49 -0600
There is virtually no way to know who is getting spots and from where. There will never be a system requiring and login and password and even if there was, there would be a 100 different ways to get
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00232.html (9,830 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:14:37 -0500
I would guess that most of the little pistols don't cheat. If so, I'd like to know why. I have no thoughts of winning anything from my home station. I do it for fun. In the ARRL DX CW contest this ye
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00254.html (11,701 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted vs Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 13:57:52 -0600
Why do people cheat? I guess we need a psychologist or some other fancy doctor to tell us. Why do people cheat in computer games? It is rampant. I just don't get it. Mike W0MU In the ARRL DX CW conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-05/msg00261.html (12,078 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] ASSISTED vs UNASSISTED (score: 1)
Author: "JIM NEIGER" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:56:11 -0700
Assisted vs Unassisted participation was nicely summarized in the 2015 CQ WW SSB DX Contest results. Unassisted comprised 59% of the Single Operator entrants, and 41% Assisted. Perhaps when those num
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00154.html (6,719 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] ASSISTED vs UNASSISTED (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 22:00:15 -0400
According to CQWW's survey 54.5% of serious contesters worldwide did not want the categories combined. North American's felt even stronger about this with 71.5% wanting to keep assisted separate. Joh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00156.html (7,174 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] ASSISTED vs UNASSISTED (score: 1)
Author: George via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:39:01 -0400
I certainly would NOT want Assisted and Non-Assisted categories to be combined. I want them to be separate categories so I can select which ones I prefer for different types of contests. For me, I pr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00157.html (8,512 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu