Isn't this just an extension of the "If your wife brings you a sandwich, you better enter as assisted" argument? -- "Assistance" is undefined (or poorly defined at best). Therefore, it is anything th
anything that your imagination makes you believe that it is. C'mon, people, cutting through all the sophism we each know what the definition really is. -- Definition: "Assistance" is an organized me
Case-in-point... How much more "specific" can one be in communicating "VY1JA", "up 10kc" and "just" (who, where, when)? That seems to meet the definition just shared, yet you believe that it does not
I write: EV, What part of "organized method" do you not understand ??? 73, WA4TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest
<snip> "First, meeting on the air during a contest to arrange strategy, compare multipliers, or organize contacts places all participants in the Assisted category in ARRL and most other contests. <s
My definition (which I think most would chose to say is reasonable) includes the phrase ?organized method?. 73 es GL in the test, de Hans, K0HB -- and "just" (who, where, when)? That seems to meet th
I write: EV, What part of "organized method" do you not understand ??? -- I take exception with limiting the definition of "assistance" to include only "organized methods". One can certainly "assist"
only "organized methods". One can certainly "assist" randomly. And if you are the target of a 'random assist', must you then DQ yourself? If so, I can't wait to hear some of you guys in the next tes
And if you are the target of a 'random assist', must you then DQ yourself? -- If you *act* upon receiving the random assistance (information), then you are no longer unassisted. Like golf, this aspec
I took a look at the CQWW rules. Guess what - they are >>>incredibly<<< vague! to wit: 1. Single Operator High: Those stations at which one person performs all of the operating, logging, and spotting