Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BASIC\s+ANSWERS\s+WRTC\s+2006\s+QUESTIONS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+BASIC\s+ANSWERS\s+WRTC\s+2006\s+QUESTIONS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] BASIC ANSWERS WRTC 2006 QUESTIONS (score: 1): Author: PY5EG <py5eg@inepar.com.br>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:09:44 -0200; BASIC ANSWERS FOR RULES AND SELECTION CRITERIA QUESTIONS 20 December 2005 In order to clarify the rules and selection criteria developed by the WRTC 2006 Committee, we are circulating this report to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00497.html (21,051 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] BASIC ANSWERS WRTC 2006 QUESTIONS (score: 1): Author: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:13:26 -0800; Hi Oms, Thank you for your post. Please note that while there have been complaints about the criteria, no one has questioned the intent, integrity or effort of the WRTC 2006 committee. The committee; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00504.html (7,174 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] BASIC ANSWERS WRTC 2006 QUESTIONS (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:57:45 -0800; I'm surprised that there hasn't been discussion on this reflector of this aspect of WRTC 2006 yet: I know contesters that could very well merit a spot in WRTC who might not be able to afford to go ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00512.html (8,709 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]