Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Best\s+CW\s+Contest\s+radio\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Best\s+CW\s+Contest\s+radio\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: Lloyd Cabral <KH6LC@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:07:14 +0000; All the radios mentioned are excellent but many are priced out of reach for many hams. Some might seem better than others but compared to years ago, they're all great. Listening to the mostly empty; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00079.html (7,182 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: David Gilbert <ab7echo@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:55:06 -0700; In terms of clean transmitted signals, many of today's rigs are NOT "all great" compared with many older rigs. I've been disappointed to see how many of the replies to the original post only talk abo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00083.html (8,791 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: af5cc2 <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:47:08 -0500; Buying a contest winning radio is certainly cheaper than buying a contest winning antenna system!73 John AF5CC Sent via the Samsung Galaxy A10e, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -- Original message --From:; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00085.html (8,377 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: MARK BAILEY <kd4d@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:58:19 -0400 (EDT); Hi Dave: Unfortunately, the less than ideal performance on transmit offers a distinct advantage to the individuals using these radios. The key clicks in particular are a huge advantage in maintaining; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00086.html (10,562 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:10:31 -0700; On 9/16/2020 12:55 PM, David Gilbert wrote: I've been disappointed to see how many of the replies to the original post only talk about receive aspects when at least some of those same recommended rig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00088.html (8,563 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best CW Contest radio..... (score: 1): Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 20:22:38 -0400; Thats just like the old photography aphorism: The best camera is the one you have with you. Because any radio is better than none. Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net Web: http://borin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-09/msg00090.html (7,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]