Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CB\s+QRM\s+in\s+10m\s+test\s+\(opposite\)\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "BlakeM" <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2029 21:22:01 -0500
I had exactly the opposite happen. While CQing on 28.066 in the 10m test last weekend, I got an e-mail from a ham in Canada (rates were slow...) (a VE1) who said he had his CB on CH16 and could hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00350.html (9,659 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 03:37:45 -00
I Didja log him??? <grin> 73, de Hans, K0HB -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~james
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00353.html (9,278 bytes)

3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 04:20:29 -0000
Could be a bad RX on his end with some funny IF mixture that was bring ur CW signal into his RX. I did some math and came up with a 400 khz diff. not the old standard of 455 khz. Who knows what IF th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00355.html (10,529 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:17:41 -0800
Though it's not very common these days, in the old days of radio most receivers had a 455 KHz first IF frequency. For the 27.155 channel that would require a 27.610 local oscillator frequency. Can yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00371.html (11,631 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:54:46 -0800
Well, we need to be careful. If there is something I don't want to do, it's QRM an illegal CB'er. 73 Tom W7WHY bring ur CW signal into his RX. selected for their boxes. -- The world's top contesters
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00372.html (9,319 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: Chuck <discreetly_confidential@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 07:44:25 -0800 (PST)
I had illegal invaders on 10M. I just QSY'd to Zero Beat their AM carrier and called CQ! Amazing!! after about 2 -3 minutes they went QRT! And they stayed off until I left! Ahh, the joys of PROACTIVE
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00377.html (10,119 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:26:47 +0100
Has the FCC totaly stopped to enforce/or controll the HF spectrum in the States? Seems to me they have a lot of work to do. In Sweden the "Swedish FCC" hardly does anything these days, most people th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00380.html (11,424 bytes)

8. RE: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Macie, Gordon" <GMacie@innotrac.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:39:53 -0500
The cb'er could copy cw ! Well, we need to be careful. If there is something I don't want to do, it's QRM an illegal CB'er. 73 Tom W7WHY bring ur CW signal into his RX. selected for their boxes. -- T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00383.html (10,068 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:22:08 -0800
I have often thought that when the big gun stations have nothing to do between contests they should spend a few hours each day looking for CBers on 10. When they find one, get on its freq and call CQ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00389.html (11,535 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:54:03 -0500 (EST)
try if you want, but there are a couple things to remember. first, the truckers and even many of the base stations i have heard on 10m are very close together. the truckers that hang out around 2808
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00399.html (11,480 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck Dietz" <w5pr@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:22:41 -0600
I am a little uncomfortable with talk of intentionally QRMing an ongoing communication even if it is unlicensed. There are legal CB operators on 10 meters by the way. Those of you with big and high a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00403.html (13,569 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Chuck" <k3ft@erols.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 17:08:57 -0500
I am a little uncomfortable with talk of intentionally QRMing an ongoing communication even if it is unlicensed. , I don't think it is proper to intentionally or systematically QRM them. We are a cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00405.html (11,180 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Pack (NX5M)" <nx5m@txcyber.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:17:34 -0600
I observed several of these guys on earlier today. Highest frequency I found was 28255 although I have heard thim at 28605 before. Seems to me that these guys have to be close to some ham somewhere.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00406.html (15,605 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:36:30 -0000
the really The 'proper channels': To: rholling@fcc.gov cc: cskolaut@arrl.org I would not go direct to the companies, it is more likely to work if you get the fcc to send them a nice letter like the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00407.html (12,916 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CB QRM in 10m test (opposite) (score: 1)
Author: "Mark S. Williams" <k9gx@n4gn.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 06:22:11 -0000
On page 24 of the January, 2004 edition of QST in the "Correspondence" column ARRL Field and Regulatory correspondent Chuck Skolaut, K0BOG, responds to a letter regarding 10m QRM as follows: "Any ama
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00412.html (10,487 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu