Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Participation\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+Participation\?\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: John Boudreau <John_Boudreau@gov.nt.ca>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:28:37 +0000; Looking at the CQ WW online database activity trend http://www.cqww.com/stats.htm shows a marked increase in participation in both modes over the last 7 or 8 years. Would anyone care to speculate wha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00259.html (8,789 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:03:45 -0500; I told them that the rare VE8 mult was going to be on. <BSEG> 73, de Hans, K0HB Looking at the CQ WW online database activity trend http://www.cqww.com/stats.htm shows a marked increase in participat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00262.html (9,589 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 20:51:33 -0600; The ease of submitting a log via email. Barry W2UP 73 John VE8EV N2NC and his team of bleary eyed typists have been at it again. Two additional years, 1967 and 1968, have been added to the CQWW onlin; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00263.html (8,927 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:04:14 -0500; Two things: - Contest activity is way up during this time (because it is fun) - Log submission via email is becoming accepted (because it is easy and free) The Cabrillo log standard was accepted by C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00264.html (10,450 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:48:46 +0700; easy answer......... -automated call sign reporting and -click to find and -click to log, -more easy mode that way and lower power still works ok, efficient. -more better code readers. de hs0zCW -- C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00265.html (10,418 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 23:34:24 -0600; The availability of free, high performance contesting software and support from N1MM Logger. 73, Steve, N2IC 73 John VE8EV N2NC and his team of bleary eyed typists have been at it again. Two addition; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00266.html (10,334 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: "Larry Gauthier $K8UT$" <K8UT@charter.net>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 06:05:23 -0400; ...a marked increase in participation in BOTH MODES over the last 7 or 8 years. I heard a rumor that theyve been thinking about sponsoring a third mode - CQ WW RTTY. I wonder if those results will ev; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00267.html (10,612 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 08:20:57 -0400; Seven years ago we were at or approaching the solar minimum. I remember being at PJ2T for CQWW CW in 2007 and 2008 - on 10 meters we had something 150 and 35 QSOs, respectively. I hope interest holds; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00269.html (8,895 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: Steve Sacco NN4X <nn4x@embarqmail.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 09:37:43 -0400; Another way to look at this, rather than "number of logs", is by "number of unique callsigns". Calculating the percentage of entries versus the total Amateur Radio population would be insightful, as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00270.html (8,441 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 11:40:18 -0400; All of the reasons given so far really only apply to recent years say 1990 and later. I remember calling CQ for hours on phone in 1962-3 with no replies. There were much fewer contesters back then as; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-09/msg00271.html (10,439 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Participation? (score: 1): Author: "Yan (XV4Y)" <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>; Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 14:31:15 +0700; Hi, That's still the case even in solar peak if you leave in an area with a low radioamateur population like here in SE Asia. When the band does not open to EU or NA, you can get bored very quickly w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-10/msg00001.html (7,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]