The CQWW sponsors are leading the way in defining and, hopefully, clamping down on unsportsmanlike conduct. They say " "Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct include..... 5. Signals with excessive band
I like the idea of letting the other party know their signal is wide. However, adding a suffix to the call seems likely to cause headaches when it comes to things like uploading to LoTW and so on --
Its a great idea, Paul. As you know, the CQWW committee is using SDRs around the world to collect spectrum audio and use it in the case of adjudication of log checking (http://cqww.com/blog/?p=67). I
"Q" for "Quality" Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 11/4/2013 8:06 AM, Paul O'Kane wrote: The CQWW sponsors are leading the way in def
I didn't mean to suggest adding WIDE in your log. Just include it as part of what you tell the other station. Advise, and then move on; no need to wait for a response (or denial, excuses, etc). Heari
Let's leave the KiloCycle Kop duties up to the sponsors, not a lot of self-appointed vigilantes. 73, de Hans, K0HB The CQWW sponsors are leading the way in defining and, hopefully, clamping down on u
If you know/see that the station has a wide signal, and if its bothers you, dont work them! When you work a station /Q, you feel the station should be disqualified; still you work the station because
WIDE or any characters won't work in contests where the exchange is always numeric, where letters are expected to be cut numbers and not text. I discovered this in the Ukraine contest this past weeke
The thing is, none of that is needed. It should be possible to write a software application that scans the entire SDR recording and quantifies the energy density in the frequency domain of a CW signa
I remember a time back in the 80's and 90's where many of the Russian and Eastern block signals were pretty bad but we were quite happy to work them regardless. Keep in mind that most of those ops ha