Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+160\s+CW\:\s+Early\s+Hours\s+Suggestion\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@k8nd.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 12:05:50 -0500
Jim W8WTS and I are ready to go at PJ2T for the CQWW 160 CW Contest this weekend. One of the things I did during the "off season" is analyze one of our frustrations: the fact that we can hear Europe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00212.html (8,840 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 21:02:52 -0800
I also experience this operating from NorCal -- during the first hours of a Topband contest, we hear a lot of the better equipped stations east of Chicago, but almost without exception, they don't he
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00213.html (8,850 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:15:20 -0500
I think there is more to it. First off, at the start of the contest, EVERY QSO is a new mult. So - NA works NA, EU works EU - lots of mults for everyone. Trying to find/work PJ2T, or any other Carrib
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00215.html (12,312 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 16:21:27 +0000 (UTC)
You guys should try the RAEM contest. Must be one of the most frustrating ones as nobody bothers listening towards NA. Rudy N2WQ I also experience this operating from NorCal -- during the first hours
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00216.html (10,290 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Franki ON5ZO <on5zo@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 20:31:10 +0100
Why risk some rudeboy invading your run frequency because 'it was clear' for more than 1000 milliseconds? responding!" Yes emphasize the ALL. I don't think many people around here have an RX antenna
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00217.html (9,625 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Dale Putnam <daleputnam@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 13:02:06 -0700
It's still location, location., I feel.. I have a low dipole, and a looong one.. and a vertical.. on a steel roof (over 1600 sq ft).. and it is still two against one.. just pick a time.. and my main
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00218.html (8,614 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 20:41:15 -0300
and what about the DX windows? Will be good if stations like PJ2T, NP2J, and others from Caribbean left this windows for real DX stations. This stations works more than 1500 qsos! OH, yes, of course,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00220.html (10,088 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: jmaass@k8nd.com
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:01:53 -0500
G'day Jorge:   1. What is this 'DX Window' of which you speak? DX Windows were eliminated from all bandplans years ago, and the CQ 160 rules make no reference at all to a DX Window. The only remainin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00222.html (12,343 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:36:14 -0300
Hello Jeff well, donīt know about no more DX Windows, I think thereīs no more DX windows because many people donīt respect it so maybe the easy solution was to remove it? What I mean in my poor engli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00223.html (14,626 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:33:45 -0500
The "DX Window" on 160 is really a relic of very old times when split frequency was not only the norm but the necessity for almost all DX Qs. That time passed 30+ years ago. The "worst place" to find
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00224.html (8,791 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 160 CW: Early Hours Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 22:16:46 -0500
Hello Jorge, For the record, I noted PJ2T in the neighborhood of 1813 kHz very early Sunday morning. (I'd be more specific, but they never heard me, so I don't have a logged frequency). XE2X was arou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00225.html (16,502 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu