Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+impt\s+notice\:\s+optional\s+modification\s+tocabrillo\s+format\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CQWW\s+impt\s+notice\:\s+optional\s+modification\s+tocabrillo\s+format\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 08:10:32 -0600; Ah yes, I stand corrected. Multi-single mult stations should not call CQ. (I don't do multi-single). CQWW rules are pretty specific "...The multiplier station cannot call CQ." 73, Igor UA9CDC _______; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00166.html (10,224 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 19:55:22 +0600; Luc, I do not think this will happen. Such cheaters will have to comment out too many QSOs then. Not only they will loose a lot of points they can be also DQed on the basis of unsportsmanship. 73, Ig; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00179.html (14,915 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 20:06:42 +0600; CQWW rules are pretty specific "...The multiplier station cannot call CQ." 73, Igor UA9CDC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00181.html (9,996 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format (score: 1): Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:08:26 -0700; and the rules say the multiplier station shall only work new multipliers...................... What is the difference. It is ok to break one rule but not the other? Mike W0MU J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00183.html (10,044 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW impt notice: optional modification tocabrillo format (score: 1): Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:29:08 +0600; IMHO the difference is in intent. One thing is to brake rules deliberately. Another - genuine mistake. 73, Igor UA9CDC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Conte; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00209.html (11,325 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]