Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Band\s+width\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Band\s+width\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Band width (score: 1): Author: field@nucleus.com (Tony Field); Date: Sun Feb 25 19:16:16 2001; I have an interesting GIF image from Funk Amateur (Feb/1999) that shows the relative width of CW signals at 20wpm and a clean PSK31 signal. If anybody is interested in looking at this, I have placed; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00208.html (7,734 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] CW Band width (score: 1): Author: field@nucleus.com (Tony Field); Date: Mon Feb 26 12:57:42 2001; If a modern synthesizer is used to key the radio and the radio is not running in full QSK mode (or if separate synthesizers are used for RX and TX), I suspect that the only time settling and bounce s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00227.html (8,850 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] CW Band width (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon Feb 26 14:00:29 2001; Rise and fall times are only a small part of the bandwidth issue Tony. Synthesizer settling and bounce can be a major player. PSK people try to sell it based on how narrow the mode is, and yet it ha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00231.html (7,399 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] CW Band width (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Mon Feb 26 20:10:12 2001; I've heard that difference in a 775DSP when on QSK and on semibreakin. At least some 775's let out a "thump" on the receive frequency and between the receive frequency and transmit frequency. When y; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-02/msg00235.html (8,476 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]