Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+\-\s+Bring\s+it\s+on\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CW\s+Skimmer\s+\-\s+Bring\s+it\s+on\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Bring it on. (score: 1): Author: "Professional Home Inspections" <Paul@ProHomeInspector.net>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 22:15:56 -0400; I asked a well respected CW big gun about CW Skimmer. This is his answer, take it for what it's worth, but the last paragraph says it all. Paul K2DB 1. We all know (we've gotten the message) that we; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00032.html (8,369 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Bring it on. (score: 1): Author: rt_clay@bellsouth.net; Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:53:09 +0000; Huh? Just attach skimmer before your first IF filter. Problem solved. Or use a completely separate receiver. I just hope the people who actually write the new rules (whatever they turn out to be) are; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00043.html (8,394 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer - Bring it on. (score: 1): Author: w5ov@w5ov.com; Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:10:37 -0400 (EDT); Paul, It is apparent that you have not read my previous response to you regarding skimmer. It is not the use of it to copy CW to make individual qsos that is the problem. You and your "respected CW b; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00045.html (9,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]