Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+CX2DK\s+\-\s+NOT\s+DQ\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Scott Robbins via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 02:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Hi - The "best contest station" should also include the ability to record an entire contest, which is much easier than building towers, running many km of cables or the million other hardware things
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00088.html (8,033 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 04:04:30 +0000
Is there an Amateur Radio contest similar to the Professional Radio CQWW contest? 73, de Hans, K0HB -- 73, de Hans, K0HB -- "Just a boy and his radio" _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00091.html (9,294 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:13:23 -0300
sure, a great amateur contest station, not a profesional audio studio You must be tired to repeat always the same. Other DQ ops told that you never answer them, dont know what is best 73, Jorge 2017-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00109.html (9,177 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:41:53 -0800
Jorge, With all due respect, making a recording of a contest by feeding headphone audio to a computer or dedicated audio recorder is hardly "professional audio." I've posted links to presentations an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00115.html (8,170 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:45:27 -0300
Hello Jim I know you are very helpful. Anyway as other said, recording have many issues, but that not mean that is impossible. I will check what can i do with my cables and the K3 and will ask for se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00120.html (9,786 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:14:11 -0500
10 years old video, but still good... "You still need to lighten up, guys!.." It's just a hobby. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCN-3jkMHqE Yuri VE3DZ _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00121.html (7,747 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:59:25 -0500
Hi Jorge, It's possible that all the unfortunate things you described has already happened to somebody, somewhere, sometime. What can you do? Repair everything, buy spares if applicable/affordable, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00122.html (10,419 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:27:23 +0000
It really doesn't matter what you think about what a recording may or may not prove. It's part of the rules. You knew it was part of the rules because of the previous year. You chose to ignore it. Yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00124.html (11,061 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bowyer <peter@salmark.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:13:06 +0000
Apologies if I've mixed people up. Nobody can answer the question about what happens if the audio fails. Why should that make any difference to the rule? Many things can go wrong, you just have to de
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00128.html (14,489 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: charlie@thegallos.com
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:47:30 -0500
<snip> Them's the breaks - fix it so it won't happen <snip> Again - it is part of the rules, you deal with the rules 'Sometimes You Eat the Bear, and Sometimes the Bear Eats You" <snip> If the Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00130.html (10,125 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:43:26 -0600
It may only prove the operator is adept at arranging affairs so the recording only makes it appear to be a clean operation. 73, kelly, ve4xt _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00135.html (11,462 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:12:14 -0700
Exactly. Without his recording they cannot do further analysis. A so called clean recording could be shot full of holes with SDR recordings, etc. It doesn't matter what we think. The rules are the ru
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00142.html (12,447 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 20:47:26 -0300
Mike you must read the rules, what are you doing that you didn't read the rules, thats very bad!, (just a joke), as the rules say, all logs are public http://cqww.com/publiclogs/ 73, Jorge -- 73, Jor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00155.html (14,312 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:30:14 -0500
Why do you want him to release his log? I thought the idea was to keep the methods of finding cheaters secret? Ria N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00164.html (13,956 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:42:46 -0500
rules, No, not all logs are made public. Look at rule V.D. which seems particularly applicable to logs converted to checklogs: "Checklog: Entry submitted to assist with the log checking. The entry wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00166.html (9,036 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:34:49 -0600
Hi Mike, Youre right: SDR recordings could be used to detect padding of both logs and audio files with phony QSOs. Without crafting a how-to guide to cheating, I can think of a half-dozen OTHER ways
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00171.html (14,641 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] CX2DK - NOT DQ (score: 1)
Author: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 22:14:14 -0700
I would agree that generally not one piece of the data is enough to catch the smart ones. It is just a tool. I am sure people are still gaming the game to win pieces of paper and that is really quite
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00174.html (14,561 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu