- 1. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and licenses (score: 1)
- Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:12:06 -0500
- The latter is the case. You can use either callsign, as your and the station owner's preferences dictate. In years past, the FCC would issue to Radio Amateurs both "station licenses" (to which a call
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00292.html (12,196 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and licenses (score: 1)
- Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 00:34:02 -0000
- Quack's I do this almost ever WPX contest, with a common K7?? call I borrow one from a friend who has a 220 repeter with the call WR7HE assigned. Its his call and I can violate any of the FCC rules I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00304.html (13,340 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and licenses (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:48:17 -0700
- What if a person holds a Tech license and uses an Extra Class's call. Legally he should not be on the Extra Class freqs but who would know the difference? -- _________________________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00312.html (15,177 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Callsigns and licenses (score: 1)
- Author: "Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <wn3vaw@fyi.net>
- Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:26:53 -0400
- Who would know? Probably no one, unless someone owned up to who the operator was. However, should the word come out, then the owner of the call might have to answer a few questions. Seems to me that
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00327.html (15,904 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu