Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+$in\s+bridge$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+$in\s+bridge$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cheating (in bridge) (score: 1): Author: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 14:32:21 +0100; Hi, a great longread in the New Yorker about cheating in bridge. I won't spoil the author's ufb work with some thoroughly crafted cliffhangers. So many things sound familiar and give a fascinating in; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00077.html (7,553 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating (in bridge) (score: 1): Author: N1MM <n1mmtomwagner@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:10:06 -0500; The parallels to contesting are pretty striking. I particularly like how they "crowd sourced" the analysis of the videos and split the problem into those who could see the cheating pattern and then t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00082.html (9,348 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]