Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cheating\s+\-\s+Big\s+Amps\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Witold Zakurzewski <sp5uhw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 00:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
Som people are stupid to show the Big Amps and later claim New Record. http://www.esr.se/exteknik/allmant/bigguns.html I hav more informations about many Big Amps on my page www.sp5u ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00023.html (7,055 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:25:08 -0500
I do not have a problem with guys showing their big amps on the web but what message is sent by member of CQWW DX contest committee, ES5TV. Proof in pictures is here: http://www.palapk.edu.ee/main.ph
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00027.html (7,170 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Jorge Diez - CX6VM" <cx6vm.jorge@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:22:01 -0300
and there´s many more in the same situation Danny, and worst is that the photos show the younger's learning about ham radio with this big amplifiers. In the future they will assume that this is "norm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00028.html (8,537 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:42:36 -0500
WOW!! Old saying is: "attack is best defence". Those were cheap shots. First of all, I have announced my little experiment publicly among my contest club members, secondly I was not exposed (sadly)an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00030.html (15,153 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:09:17 +0300
What are you trying to say Danny? You are calling me names after you were exposed with cluster cheating in CQWW and you cheated in Low Power category running KW or more? I have never tried to hide th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00031.html (11,961 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:12:01 -0500
Maybe it's time to re-think the power limit? I have a 1500 Watt microwave oven that cooks my food. It's nothing special. Why shouldn't hams be able to experiment with 10 kW, 25 kW, or even 100 kW amp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00032.html (10,515 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:16:54 -0500
Once again, appears to be convicting a guy based on circumstantial evidence... Having amps and using them, and then using them illegally, are two separate things. If I had a BIG amp, using it at amat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00033.html (9,800 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:11:57 -0500
Hi Kelly, I did not convict Tonno ES5TV at all, just pointed the finger on his example of power mongers in EU. Your points about headroom do not hold water, I have seen first hand AL-1500 and AL-1200
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00035.html (10,916 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:48:49 -0500
Maybe FCC would like to hear your proposal. I guess someone had some thinking about that and limitted US hams to 1500W. To me, some limits like 400w in Italy, Australia and 750W in Germany are too lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00037.html (12,105 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Christian Schneider" <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:44:34 +0200
Little pistol view: Regarding any individual I cannot claim that he were running excessive power - without seeing a calibrated power meter in his shack or better having field strength measurements on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00038.html (10,902 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:03:39 +0400
The idea about UHP class is not all that bad... or why not recommend people using total transmitted power more than 1.5 kW (or actually 1.0 kW which is the legal limit in most European countries) to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00039.html (16,011 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:58:11 -0400
Not to get into the complaining fun, but some comments are not technically accurate and may mislead people trying to have a clean signal. Not true. While dissipation doe not decrease linearly at the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00040.html (11,208 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 13:31:11 +0200
E73M wrote: Everybody with some amplifier building knowledge is familiar what happens when you run amplifier at 1500w designed with output filter for 5+ kW. Not much, really, you just have to increas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00042.html (9,484 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:48:26 -0500
Hi Tom, I know you are technical guru and I really value and thank you for explanation about linear amplifiers. Well, it is true that my Alpha 8100 was hotter with 750W out as initially we started RT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00048.html (12,806 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:08:47 -0400
Hi Danny, The biggest problem we have is people hammering their already marginally clean radios and amplifiers trying to get a little extra power. That is just stupid CB operating, let's not encourag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00049.html (10,840 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:12:52 +0200
Once upon a time Alpha made a good tube linear amplifiers but than came Acom If 50 W of drive is required for legal output of 1500 W, further reduced drive of 33 W (for 1.000 W output) would be even
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00051.html (9,061 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating - Big Amps (score: 1)
Author: e73m@e73m.com
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 14:37:41 -0500
Thanks for advice, I guess driving 3cx3000 with 100W is not feasible but is it clean enough? 73 Danny, 4O/E73M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00070.html (10,031 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu