Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Coax\s+Stubs\s+for\s+SO2R\s*$/: 111 ]

Total 111 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:50:46 -0400
Mike, here is an easy to understand document about coax stubs written by K2TR. It has diagrams as well.                                   https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00124.html (8,758 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: GW4BLE <steve.gw4ble@btconnect.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 20:41:21 +0000
I can relate to this situation here at my SO2R setup, the problem being proximity (closeness) of the antennas to the station. My tower, with TH11 and 402-CD, is almost over the shack. For 10/15/20 I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00131.html (13,340 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Smith VE9AA" <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 09:50:54 -0300
You wont believe this guysbut I turned on my amp yesterday (in between soldering up a really cool YCCC SO2R+ kit) just to blow some dust out as I havent used it in a long time and believe it or not..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00143.html (8,867 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:45:13 -0500
Dirty Tranny? And the amp is adding another layer of filtering to the exciters signal? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 9/13/2015 7:5
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00146.html (9,586 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Hider" <n3rr@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 01:58:59 -0400
Hi Mike, I can think of a least one scenario, Mike, that meets all of the symptoms you've been describing...read below. My assumption, therefore is: You are measuring your interstation interference b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00147.html (14,194 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: steve.root@culligan4water.com
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:24:04 +0000
Crusty connection somewhere. Dirty Tranny?And the amp is adding another layer of filtering to the exciters signal?Joe WB9SBDSigThe Original Rolling Ball ClockIdle TymeIdle-Tyme.comhttp://www.idle-tym
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00148.html (10,149 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:21:20 -0500
I got two Ideas to test also, 1- switch radios? Make "B" be the transmitter and "A" the receiver and see if things are the same? This could possibly remove the "A" leaking transmiter. 2- Take the stu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00150.html (15,813 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Roberts, Will" <Will.Roberts@duke-energy.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:44:52 +0000
My switch box is mounted in a crawl space under my house. It is about halfway from the tower to the shack. Most standard T connectors will fit on the switch box if oriented correctly. Could you possi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00151.html (12,708 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 23:27:46 -0700
Yes, it can matter a LOT where along the line stubs are inserted. See my piece in NCJ, or here. http://k9yc.com/LocatingStubs.pdf 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-09/msg00155.html (9,737 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: rob <wa1fcn@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 13:21:16 -0500
On 9/8/2015 5:22 PM, Peter Voelpel wrote: That shorted stub cut for 20m has to be installed on the 20m station (station B) to suppress 40 and 15 there. On the 40m station (station A)you will need an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00004.html (11,107 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll.dave@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 13:36:35 -0700
Put a 23' Shorted stub on the 40 feedline (passes 40 and 15, rejects 20 and 10) Put a 23' open stub on the tribander (passes 20 and 10, rejects 40 and 15). Of course, you won't be able to use 15 with
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00011.html (8,519 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff AC0C" <keepwalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 16:59:02 -0500
That's a great way to start. Especially as the solar cycle fades and 10/15 are not open. Then in the day, you run 40/20, and in the night you run 80/40. 73/jeff/ac0c www.ac0c.com alpha-charlie-zero-c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00014.html (11,966 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 23:57:28 -0700
Yes, but there's a LOT more to it if you want to maximize the effectiveness of the stubs. It can matter a LOT (20-30 dB) where along the line stubs are placed, both with respect to the antenna and to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00019.html (8,784 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 10:07:36 -0700
On Mon,10/5/2015 7:20 AM, Jukka Klemola wrote: Jim, I thought placing double stubs on the TX line is not so critical. The two band stopping stubs are supposed to be about quarter wave apart; on the h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00025.html (15,289 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:20:54 +0300
Jim, I thought placing double stubs on the TX line is not so critical. The two band stopping stubs are supposed to be about quarter wave apart; on the harmonic band; and that should effectively remov
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00031.html (10,174 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:06:40 +0300
Recipe for this: http://www.yccc.org/Articles/K3NA_stubs.pdf Eric has done a wonderful job describing the ultimate stub system. But the stub construction method is critical to build; personally I li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-10/msg00032.html (9,685 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:11:52 -0500
What happens if you have a single stub, and it is placed right at the output connector? Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 10/5/2015 12
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00051.html (14,638 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Jukka Klemola <jpklemola@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 20:37:38 +0300
Hi Joe and others, Placing a stub at output connector helps a tad in case your output circuit that shows a low impedance to ground at the harmonic. That is typical for nearly all our equipment that h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00052.html (17,486 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 14:08:24 -0400
Just wondering, why use stubs at first place? What's the advantage compared to LPF or BPFs? Rudy N2WQ Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect. _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00053.html (16,908 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs for SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:42:42 -0500
Thats simple $ I have stubs for 40 and 20 and had a total cost of $0.00 Joe WB9SBD Sig The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com On 7/17/2016 1:08 PM, Rudy Baka
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-07/msg00054.html (15,991 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu