- 1. [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1)
- Author: "DL8WPX" <joerg@dl8wpx.de>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:08:48 +0200
- Folks, Thank you very much for the WAEDC discussion so far. I'm delighted that we finally have unearthed something laying around unattended for a while. Looking thru my mails I see many opinions voic
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00320.html (11,205 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1)
- Author: K1AR@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:24:17 EDT
- All, After reading all of the mail on this subject, here is my take: 1) There are a bunch of unenforceable, uncoordinated band plan recommendations in place. 2) No one is going to observe them in thi
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00323.html (12,286 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1)
- Author: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:38:51 +0000
- Because there STILL aren't enough sunspots! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net _________________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00324.html (7,372 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest-Preferred Segments (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Henderson <bob@5b4agn.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:06:57 +0000
- The difficulty I have with this, is that WAE 2009 Rule 2 attributes a position to IARU which I can find no evidence it holds. The recently published IARU Region 1 band plan makes no mention of contes
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00329.html (14,066 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu