Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Calls\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 10:15:03 -0000
If you are serious about contesting, then you should be serious about the callsign used. . The KISS ( Keep it simple stupid) concept works for a reason. Since many contest stations can now pick their
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00378.html (7,524 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:04:21 -0500
Last time I checked the prefix for Dominica was J7 not J70. I see nothing confusing about some one using J7OJ as their call. I recall many people using 1x1 calls in past contests like J7J and J7K fro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00394.html (7,399 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:31:43 -0600 (CST)
For a while it was considered "standard" for a callsign to have a prefix followed by a number. In the case of prefixes like A2, A3, C2, J5 etc. that is the prefix and should technically be followed b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00402.html (8,682 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Bob Nielsen <nielsen@oz.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:21:30 -0800
Normal calls in Dominica use a digit in addition to the J7 prefix, e.g., J79Z, J75KG, J79GU, to mention a few from my logs. While other special calls (normally issued for contests) have had no digit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00403.html (7,950 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 01:01:03 -0500
Jeff, Yes, the prefix for Dominica is J7, but convention allows that to be followed by another numeric digit. Your argument is like saying that the prefix for Canada is VE, but that doesn't mean that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00411.html (8,938 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 08:41:08 EST
Normal calls in Dominica use a digit in addition to the J7 prefix, e.g., J79Z, J75KG, J79GU, to mention a few from my logs. While other special calls (normally issued for contests) have had no digit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-02/msg00416.html (8,140 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: "Jeffrey Clarke" <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:34:18 -0400
I know this contester who seems to show up in the WPX contest every year with a different call sign. This person has a distinctive sounding voice so I knew who he was. Anyway, I run into him in the W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00313.html (8,718 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:07:26 -0800
Jeff, I don't read where it says the holder of the call sign has to be present. I think he just has to take equal responsibility for the operation of the station. "When the control operator is a diff
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00315.html (11,295 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:02:54 -0500
I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on TV... If the FCC is making provisions for the license holder to not be present, then the FCC is saying that the licensee does not need to be present. The rule is j
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00324.html (12,597 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:57:53 -0500
I wonder if there is more concrete rule on this? That's a little vague,, How about with club calls. Say a club is not as a club going to compete in a certain contest, but one of the members plans on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00325.html (12,270 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: John_Laney@gamb.uscourts.gov
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:25:30 -0400
It seems to that the situation posited by Jeff, KU8E, is OK if it is understood that both the licensee and the control op are equally responsible for compliance and the permission is documented in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00333.html (8,287 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: mike l dol dormann <w7dra@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:27:25 -0700
is it not being given permission what is important? for a dxpidition, i was given the club transceiver, the club call, and after the award was received by the club trustee, i received the ARRL DX con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00336.html (8,239 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: David Levine <david@levinecentral.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:12:03 -0400
I noticed one specific call and I emailed Jeffrey directly vs posting to the group. I'm a newer operator so my question might seem odd, but isn't there a difference between the station and the operat
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00338.html (10,524 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:25:38 -0600
Yes, in fact the FISTS have the callsign KN0WCW and allow members to use it with permission from the trustee as long as it's arranged in advance. Check out the listing on qrz.com. 73, Zack W9SZ _____
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00339.html (14,094 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu