Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Rules\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+Rules\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: k4ww@arrl.net (Shelby Summerville); Date: Sun Apr 28 13:37:16 2002; 4.Exchange: The required exchange consists of: 4.1. A consecutive serial number; 4.2. Precedence; 4.2.1. "Q" for Single Op QRP (5 W output or less); 4.2.2. "A" for Single Op Low Power (up to 150 W o; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00439.html (8,308 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: k0hb@earthlink.net (KØHB); Date: Sun Apr 28 21:59:02 2002; Sunuvugun, Shelby. That's going to cause a lot of difficulty for folks with calls which have been recycled. For example our club got the call W0EF in 1994. Before that we were KB0SAH (1992). We got t; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00442.html (7,668 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: n5nj@gte.net (Bob Naumann - N5NJ); Date: Sun Apr 28 21:39:28 2002; K4WW stated: check K0HB queried: " Now, if I am operating W0EF in SS do I use: The correct answer would be "C". Because: The callsign being used was issued to the club, and 1992 was the year the club; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00446.html (7,250 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.rr.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Mon Apr 29 11:16:17 2002; I became licensed as a novice in 1960. Updated to technician before the novice expired but let it lapse after the five year term. Became licensed again in 1994. What year should I use? To paraphrase; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00449.html (6,986 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>; Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2006 23:09:27 -0000; When contest committees change rules just for the sake of changing rules it is a real hardship for an ole-fart, like me. The changes to the CQP county abbreviations seem to have no rationale. The old; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00102.html (6,906 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Robert Chudek - KØRC <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 11:34:52 -0500; Mal, I believe the California folks are leading the charge to implement the new 2x4 abbreviation list that makes all 3000+ USA counties unique. The new list creates a standard for all logging/contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00107.html (8,744 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:52:22 -0000; Yeah, and that list only has to be updated every couple of months or so... David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1tt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00113.html (7,671 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Doug Smith W9WI <w9wi@earthlink.net>; Date: 08 Oct 2006 19:48:27 -0500; The feds have already done this: http://www.census.gov/datamap/fipslist/AllSt.txt Three digits or four letters, I wonder which is faster? (I'd imagine your chances of getting a non-contestant to give; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00116.html (8,151 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:20:54 -0400; Dave, I'm the logchecker for the Michigan QSO Party, and write logging software as well. I've never heard of any "standardization" effort. If the instigators of this want to gain wide acceptance, the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00117.html (8,957 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 23:00:29 -0400; Who comes up with this stuff anyway? Now we have a "standard" list for all 3076+ US counties? Just like that? I'm sorry, but it is just not possible to subscribe to every mail list in existance, and; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00120.html (9,830 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "James Cain" <cainjim@mindspring.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:40:54 -0400; K6VVA, I feel your pain. I presume the new four-character county abbreviations for the California QSO Party are the reason that there is a new DAT file for CT. According to the CQP web site, CT 10 do; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00125.html (9,079 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Jim Idelson <k1ir@designet.com>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:17:46 -0400; I liked the new system in CQP. It made sense to my simple mind. I did not appreciate the behavior of those who sent an old abbreviation even though they knew the new one. Yes, logging software has to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00126.html (7,939 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:09:05 -0400; MARAC adopted W0QE's list of 2x4 county abbreviations for the County Hunters CW Contest because the managers of that contest do have to deal with all 3076 counties being in play at once. Whether such; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00128.html (10,329 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 11:15:33 -0500; I found it necessary to keep the CQP Counties window up to assist in logging. If you think this is a challenge, you should try TQP. We have 254 counties! 73, Keith NM5G I liked the new system in CQP.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00130.html (8,926 bytes)
15. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:02:43 -0800; It is because many of the rules are poorly written, lack clarity, and need an overhaul. I fault various Contest Sponsors for their lack of Leadership that this whole issue continues and continues an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00850.html (7,606 bytes)
16. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rules (score: 1): Author: Phillip Conza <zl2tze@yahoo.com.au>; Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:28:06 -0700 (PDT); In this day and age rules have to be 100 % as the armchair / bush lawyers will have a field day on any ambiguous meanings. Many a race ( car/boat/horse ) has been lost over a rule book; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00102.html (7,675 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]