Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+results\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contest\s+results\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: "Paul Jones" <paul@nn4f.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:45:19 -0400; In these days and times of ever faster computers, and mostly computer generated logs, anyone wonder why it still seems to take forever for the contest results to come out. Are the sponsors and organi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00551.html (7,060 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:51:30 -0700 (PDT); I would guess some start as soon as they have two logs. Particularly the large contests... It takes a lot of time to compare all of the logs in say CQWW or ARRL DX. Then you also have to translate th; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00560.html (8,405 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: "doug smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:03:42 -0500; Speaking for the Tennessee QSO Party, we begin working the day after the deadline. Final results have to wait for a couple of things. First, you have to have all the paper logs in - you have to wait; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00562.html (8,571 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:38:02 -0400; I suspect that a rather large part of the delay is for lack of help. There are so many more people who participate and enter contests than there are those who work on the results of those contests. -; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00567.html (7,630 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:08:36 -0700; I think it's easy to see how it could be four months after the contest before the results appear in a magazine. a) The log submission deadline is probably 1 month after the event. b) Allow one month; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00570.html (10,257 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:28:25 -0700 (PDT); John, K4BAI pointed out to me that even the big contests rely on volunteers... Even with computers 2000+ entries are a lot to process and compare. Thanks to all of those behind the scenes! http://lis; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00574.html (9,298 bytes)
7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Results (score: 1): Author: Tack Kumagai <je1cka@chofu.jaxa.jp>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 18:47:26 +0900 (JST); As a JIDX contest chaiman There have been several paper logs still. So we have to wait for the paper logs for at least one month after the deadline. And some logs will have problems and have to be ch; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00004.html (7,725 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Contest results (score: 1): Author: "Roberts, Will" <will.roberts@pgnmail.com>; Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:04:18 -0400; Personally I don't have a problem with the results coming out months after a contest. Most all contest sponsors rely on volunteers to do the thankless job of adjudicating logs. In the event that they; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00011.html (8,413 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] contest results (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@pcnet.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:46:04 -0400; Last week Henk/PA5KT replied to a message about CQWW single band entries and what was permitted, and said, in part, "And who cares about the results? They come a year later and nobody has access unle; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-09/msg00156.html (8,175 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]