Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contesting\s+in\s+year\s+2000\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contesting\s+in\s+year\s+2000\?\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: jmellis@ihug.co.nz (Martin Ellis); Date: Mon Mar 15 23:06:42 1999; Good morning, We have an information overload of advice on PC's as to possible problems in the year 2000. It seems that the older models of 286 and 386 are unlikely to be year 2000 compliant. Our mai; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00236.html (8,057 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: n6tr@teleport.com (n6tr@teleport.com); Date: Mon Mar 15 06:43:49 1999; I will probably have to send this message a few times, but there isn't a problem with DOS based programs. The trick is that when setting the date, using the DOS date command, you have to ignore the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00239.html (8,165 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Sun Mar 14 19:50:46 1999; On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:06:42 +1300 Martin Ellis <jmellis@ihug.co.nz> writes: The year 1972 has the same calendar as 2000, so it should do the job for the contesting crowd if all else fails, with the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00240.html (7,955 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: Terry_Gerdes@trilogy.com (Terry_Gerdes@trilogy.com); Date: Mon Mar 15 09:16:24 1999; When testing Y2K compliance, its helpful to know the Y2K limitations of the operating system as well. MS-DOS 6.22 is "compliant with minor issues". Microsoft has the details at the following site htt; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00242.html (9,595 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: wa6bil-3@juno.com (Jeff Kincaid); Date: Fri Mar 26 01:15:49 1999; Lots of good comments went by on the software aspects of Y2K, but what about the hardware? I bet I'm not the only cheapskate ham still running old PCs with non-compliant BIOS. But there _is_ a soluti; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00324.html (8,808 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1): Author: rcommo@ricochet.net (Rick Commo); Date: Fri Mar 26 07:50:44 1999; On the other hand, if you're willing to use a screwdriver, you can go to http://www.pricewatch.com and look for a new mainboard (motherboard). In what may be the penultimate computer screw-up I have; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00327.html (8,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]