Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Contesting\s+using\s+remote\s+stations\s*$/: 47 ]

Total 47 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:07:45 -0400
Joe, If we put remote stations, available 24/7/365, at rare DX locations, that will INCREASE HF activity, not dimish it. That said, I believe both our points have validity and should be considered. _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00452.html (19,400 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:57:56 -0500 (CDT)
I always thought the below was poorly worded. Isn't it kind of hard to get a signal in and out if the antennas aren't connected by wires to the transmitters and receivers? The wording does not indica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00454.html (10,865 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:11:02 -0500
Looks like this point is up to interpretation. It seems to have this dual interpretation till the contest sponsors and or judges decide to specify the operator position relative to the transmitter a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00455.html (10,437 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:57:20 -0400
Here's a wild idea... Assuming for the sake of argument that the current "general contest" rule(s) regarding the physical station is outdated... that is to say, the "500 foot circle or within the pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00456.html (9,454 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Guy Molinari <guy_molinari@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:07:49 +0000
I'm in a CC&R neighborhood. Neither I nor my XYL and kids want to move. So the idea of a remote station appeals to me. If the contest sponsors rule against remote stations, then I'll just get in my c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00458.html (7,868 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:49:32 -0700
Wow, lots of stuff on this thread. I'll throw in my 2 cents here. I know it's a hot topic, and in fact a lot of guys don't even know about it. Here is a case in point. I arrived here in Seattle on Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00466.html (10,044 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: "Paul Mackanos - K2DB" <k2db@k2db.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:41:06 -0700
I do this every day. Paul k2DB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00470.html (6,592 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu