Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cordless\s+headsets\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:03:53 -0000
Since I am very clumsy, and always catching my foot in the headphone cord etc, I have for some time used a pair of ( RF)cordless cans (Sennheiser). These are really first class. Of course in my infre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00038.html (7,585 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1)
Author: "RICHARD BOYD" <ke3q@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:22:59 -0500
Yes, they are readily available here in the U.S., hence you should be able to find many to choose from on-line. I bought my Sony pair from Best Buy, a big U.S. chain. There were several makes and mod
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00436.html (7,591 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 15:10:44 -0800
Actually, the original post was inquiring about the possible availability of a cordless headset (headphones plus boom microphone.) The closest fit to ham radio might be this Plantronics headset: http
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00441.html (8,880 bytes)

4. RE: [CQ-Contest] Cordless headsets? (score: 1)
Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:05:48 -0000
Rich is right on both counts. I have also seen several of these telephone type headsets, not really good enough for our demanding purpose. However, better devices definitely do exist, as I have seen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00454.html (8,229 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu