Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s+and\s+logchecking\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Cut\s+numbers\s+and\s+logchecking\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers and logchecking (score: 1): Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:58:31 -0500; Jack, I'm the logchecker for the ARRL 10M contest where DX stations send serial numbers and yes it *is* your job to interpret sent cut numbers. The rules specify that for a valid DX (i.e, non-W/VE) Q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00262.html (10,905 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers and logchecking (score: 1): Author: K2RS <K2RSonline@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:06:29 -0500; Well, Dave, I guess I'll just have to edit all the cut numbers sent to me by the "free thinkers" out there in the ARRL CW DX contest -- after I figure out exactly what they mean. Let's see, among the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00276.html (11,524 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut numbers and logchecking (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:06:02 -0500; If one were to "just log what was sent," one would have to write the dits and dahs! - you have already had to do ONE interpretation in symbols. K8CC's answer is the most definitive I've seen after re; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00297.html (13,014 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]