Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DSP\s+units\s+with\s+great\s+noise\s+reduction\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:50:09 -0500
I made a rather serious effort in the Illinois QSO party today since I used to live in IL and know a few of the operators in the contest, plus it is only an 8 hour effort-but I wish they would move i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00102.html (7,701 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:36:16 -0300
Hello John, In my case I use several things. I have two noise cancelling units: QRM Eliminator by SP8RSM JPS ANC-4 These are no DSP but rather X-Phase type. I owned a Timewave DSP599zx which worked o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00103.html (9,821 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: Michael Walker <va3mw@portcredit.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 10:36:38 -0400
John I have to say that 80% of the noise that impacted me on the low bands (and even 2M) was in my house. The worst was a Cisco switch that wiped out from 1Mhz - 240Mhz. It was the switch I was using
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00104.html (12,736 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: Drew Vonada-Smith <drew@whisperingwoods.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:05:49 +0000
John notes that he had many noise sources, not just one. A phasing unit isn't going to help him. That's a job for reduction at source, or DSP. 73, Drew K3PA Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00105.html (14,017 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 13:19:13 -0300
I've had that situation. Even if you have multiple, depending on the strength of the EMI, it usually helps a bit, since at least it will eliminate one of them, or two in my case (I side chain the bot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00106.html (17,075 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:09:34 -0700
Not for your neighbors on the air when you're running SSB -- its IMD generates splatter on SSB and clicks on CW that make your signal 3 times wider than it should be. I discovered the SSB problem whe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00107.html (9,262 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:19:01 -0700
I have to say that 80% of the noise that impacted me on the low bands (and even 2M) was in my house. Yes, the stuff in our own homes is often our worst enemy! I spent a few days going around with a H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00108.html (9,854 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 15:12:53 -0500
Thanks for the feedback so far. Those videos are rather impressive. Other than the FTDX3000, are there other radios out there that have very good noise reduction circuits good at reducing the fatigue
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00130.html (12,228 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] DSP units with great noise reduction (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Kinzli N6GQ <jeff@n6gq.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:56:53 -0500
Not a super modern radio, but I was very impressed with the Elecraft K2 DSP daughterboard. It had an uncanny ability to pull very weak signals out of noise. It was also quite good at removing man-mad
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00138.html (13,787 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu