Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DXCC\s+Remote\s+Rules\s+Revison\s+Request\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+DXCC\s+Remote\s+Rules\s+Revison\s+Request\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] DXCC Remote Rules Revison Request (score: 1): Author: "K6VVA - Rick" <cqtest97@k6vva.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:10:00 -0800; Fellow Contesters and Contest-Peditioners: Unless the DXCC rules regarding remote station operations are changed, there will be future problems for DX'ers and Contesters receiving accreditation for c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00326.html (7,383 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] DXCC Remote Rules Revison Request (score: 1): Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:34:41 -0800; This document amounts to three pages of unmitigated rubbish and circular arguments from an operator ("ARRL Member, DX'er, Contester, Contester-Peditioner, Remote Station Operator") who clearly doesn'; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00327.html (7,443 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]