Please feel free to check it out http://cqww.com/blog/ No innuendo, just some numbers which you may find interesting (or not). de Doug KR2Q On behalf of the CQWW Contest committee ___________________
Thanks - any chance of deriving similar figures for SO LP? And if there really is to be no innuendo, then graphs that go from zero to 100% (rather than 70%) might be visually more representative. 73,
Curious how it relates to overall participation. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-cont
Here are some numbers from the 2016 CQWW CW contest that are interesting: Single-Op High All Bands ZF2MJ.........14,929,938 (N6MJ) CR3OO.........14,112,630 (CT1BOH) TI5W..........14,043,125 (KL9A) V4
Author: Bill via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:10:11 +0000 (UTC)
So 65 % of CQCWWSSB NA entrants are unlimited. Hmmm.... More interesting will be the CQWWCW. With the firehose of CW RBN spots, more people have access to more contacts. More contacts is always more