Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Definig\s+\"Spot\"\s+and\s+\"Spotting\"\s+\[was\:\s+cqww\s+ssb\s+spotanalysis\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Definig\s+\"Spot\"\s+and\s+\"Spotting\"\s+\[was\:\s+cqww\s+ssb\s+spotanalysis\]\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Definig "Spot" and "Spotting" [was: cqww ssb spotanalysis] (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:04:46 -0800 (PST); This has got to be a new record for spots. -- Dave's note raised a long-term (and much more broad) question that I will ask rhetorically here. How does one define "spotting" within the context of an; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-10/msg00720.html (7,616 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]