I recently sent the following e-mail to K5UZ, current chairman of the ARRL Board committee responsible for contesting. If you agree, please let him, and your Board representative, know how you feel.
We agree. I had sent this earlier today and was going to await a reply by "contest@arrl.org" before posting, but since we are so coherent, here's my take on the same problem: The stated purpose of th
All, While I don't have an issue with Skimmer in the contests that allow it, I do have to wonder: do all contests need to have the same rules? I actually like the boy-and-his-radio (hello, Hans) flav
Even though I accidentally ended up creating a checklog this weekend, I'm somewhat inclined to agree. I like some of the quirks in different contest when it's clear (either explicitly stated, or as a
I have subsequently been informed by none other than K1ZZ that the IARU rules will be reviewed as will the various suggestions and (there should be offered) a comprehensive proposal to the IARU Admin
For years the ARRL and the CQ 160 Contests had only two classes, Single Operator and Multi operator. These rules goes way back to the start of the packet/spot era. The ARRL deemed that having help ma